Legal simulators
LiveWhat-if engines for litigation and contracts — outcome odds, damages, settlement, cheque-bounce, tax, and AI negotiation roleplay.
- ✓Court Outcome — win-probability % with confidence interval, outcome distribution, days-to-judgment bands, and per-judge bench profiles
- ✓Damages Quantum — award percentiles (p25–p99) from won cases with your claim's position and outlier cases
- ✓Settlement — settlement-value band, fee breakdown, timeline, and a settle-vs-push recommendation
- ✓Cite-Chain — counter-citations to your argument plus a 'still good law?' status on every case you cite
What it is.
A suite of ten scenario engines that turn the court-research corpus and the risk pipeline into forward-looking projections. Model how a matter is likely to land before you file, quantify a damages claim against comparable awards, weigh settling against pushing to trial, or rehearse a negotiation against an AI counterparty that pushes back.
Every projection is grounded — outcome and damages simulators cite the comparable cases behind the numbers, the cheque-bounce engine works off the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the GST/TDS engine returns a line-by-line tax split. Each result carries a BCI Rule 36 disclaimer: these are statistical projections, not predictions or legal advice.
Three steps.
End to end.
Court outcome, damages quantum, settlement, cite-chain, counterfactual redline, Section 138, GST+TDS, drafting critic, negotiation, or a custom template.
Fill the domain form — matter facts and claim amount, a contract plus proposed edits, cheque + return-memo details, or a counterparty persona and your objectives.
Probability bands, percentile ranges, fee and timeline estimates, or a coached multi-turn negotiation — with the supporting precedents or statutory basis attached.
What you get.
- ✓Court Outcome — win-probability % with confidence interval, outcome distribution, days-to-judgment bands, and per-judge bench profiles
- ✓Damages Quantum — award percentiles (p25–p99) from won cases with your claim's position and outlier cases
- ✓Settlement — settlement-value band, fee breakdown, timeline, and a settle-vs-push recommendation
- ✓Cite-Chain — counter-citations to your argument plus a 'still good law?' status on every case you cite
- ✓Counterfactual — re-run a contract's risk score against proposed edits and see the clause-level diff
- ✓Section 138 — cheque-bounce standing check, jurisdiction options, and the statutory deadline timeline
- ✓GST + TDS — line-by-line CGST/SGST/IGST split, ITC eligibility, and TDS section/rate/threshold
- ✓Drafting Critic + Negotiation roleplay + a build-your-own custom simulator with reusable org templates
Quick answers.
No. Every simulator returns a statistical projection with a BCI Rule 36 disclaimer — a decision-support tool, not legal advice or a guaranteed outcome. Treat the cited precedents as the substance and the numbers as a guide.
From the Indian judgment corpus and the contract-risk pipeline — outcome and damages run over comparable cases, the tax engine off statutory rates and thresholds, and the cheque-bounce engine off the Negotiable Instruments Act.
More in Review & Risk Analysis.
Three-tier extraction cascade so PDF, DOCX, and scanned bilingual contracts all work.
Red, amber, or green for every clause, with an explanation and confidence score.
One number, 0-100, summarising your contract's overall risk position.
Upload a ZIP of contracts and ask one question across all of them.